Three packages of bills are making their way through Congress. Here’s a rundown of what we’re paying attention to at HCN, with gratitude to E&E News for much of the information:
PACKAGE 1 - Wilderness bills:
- On Jan. 28, the House Natural Resources Committee approved bills
that would designate 75,000 acres of new wilderness in Nevada. But
though environmental advocates praised the Pine Forest and Wovoka wilderness proposals, last-minute amendments tacked on by Rob Bishop, R-Utah, weakened the measures, The Wilderness Society
says. Bishop’s amendments would prevent federal agencies from closing
roads in or near wilderness areas without opening an equivalent road
nearby, allow logging for fire management, and prevent land adjacent to
Pine Forest from being considered for future wilderness designation.
Bishop claims the trade-offs are standard. But Peter DeFazio, D-Ore.,
called them unprecedented. “You only want (them) to be standard because
you hate the Land and Water Conservation Fund,” he retorted.
Yet while conservation-minded Democrats like DeFazio begrudged the compromise, industry backers like Bishop weren’t satisfied either. It pained him, he said, that “we are creating more wilderness than we are actually adding to economic development.” In exchange for the 75,000 acres of wilderness, restrictions will be eased on about 25,000 acres of Nevada public lands to encourage economic development, including a copper mine in Lyon County.
... You can find the rest of my story here: http://www.hcn.org/blogs/goat/the-wests-public-lands-debated-on-capitol-hill-what-were-watching
No comments:
Post a Comment