Victories in clean air and energy politics may be among the Obama
Administration’s lasting legacies, but the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency hasn’t been getting much love from rural communities lately.
Here in western Colorado coal-mining country, a hand-painted sign
reflects the opinion of many local miners: “Frack the EPA and the war on
energy!” In Idaho last week, demonstrators illegally dredged
a protected stretch of the Salmon River to protest EPA permits for
mining in Western watersheds. Since January, Kansas and seven other
rural states have passed symbolic measures
opposing the EPA’s new power-plant emission standards, and since 2010
Texas has spent millions in taxpayer dollars on more than a dozen
(mostly unsuccessful) lawsuits against the agency.
Yet in rural Alaska, where sentiment against federal oversight runs deep, a group of remote residents are actually siding with the EPA. Not only that, they’re joining the agency in fighting a powerful lawsuit filed against it.
That’s the latest news in the saga of Pebble Mine, a massive open-pit
copper mine proposed in western Alaska’s Bristol Bay region. Local
tribes and commercial fishermen fear the mine could destroy one of the
world’s most prolific salmon runs, and in 2010, tribes petitioned the EPA
to invoke a seldom-used power under the Clean Water Act to block
development. This April, after a federal environmental assessment
concluded the mine could indeed harm salmon habitat, the EPA took the
first steps to begin using the Clean Water Act to halt the mine. ...
... Click here to read the rest.
No comments:
Post a Comment